Saturday, February 4, 2012

Why are the Wallstreet Protesters not mad at Obama for giving more money to banks than any other President?

They know that no other President did not have a need to .|||who says they aren't. the OWS wasn't a partisan issue, you people made it one. these are people who are pissed off at the amount of influence corporations have over politics, how this was able to divide people is beyond me. it seems that you (and other "conservatives") are only against this movement because it is associated with the "wrong team". get over yourselves and get over your party, we're all being played like fiddles.|||Hey sunshine - I hate to burst your bubble, and I know you right wing types hate to be contradicted when your're wriong, but:





http://useconomy.about.com/od/criticalss�?/a>





President Obama wasn't President in October of 2008.





Have a lovely day - and thank you for playing.|||I guess they're pissed off at the banks for failing and needing the bailouts to begin with. They're just cutting out the middle man.|||They don't know what they're protesting about.|||From what I see, they missed out on things like boy scouts and family camp.





Now they are making up for it. Except they ARE IN THEIR 30s!!!!!|||They have no idea what they are protesting in the first place. So how could they be mad?|||Unfortunately OWS devolved into a wing of the democrat party

No comments:

Post a Comment